photography – Le blog Santé & Bien être

Comparison between the Panasonic Fz1000 and the Panasonic Fz300

Continue reading for an in-depth look at Sony’s newest full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. I wish the eye cup that surrounds the viewfinder was a little bit larger. I use glasses, and using the viewfinder in strong sunlight may be difficult for me to see through.

Most current cameras are capable of shooting video in some form or another, but these are the models we’d recommend if you want to capture video in addition to your photographs. We picked cameras that are capable of taking excellent images and making it simple to capture professional-quality video, rather than devices that would be suitable for a dedicated filmmaker. I believe that a large part of it comes down to how comfortable you will be with the ability to churn out a tool of any size on the spur of the moment.

According to the manufacturer, this advantage is due to 2.8 bits richer color depth, 0.7 EV in enhanced dynamic range, and 2.4 stops in increased low-light sensitivity. The following table offers an overview of the physical sensor properties, as well as the sensor quality measurements, for a selection of comparators in addition to the sensor quality measurements. Sensor resolution is obtained by multiplying the sensor size by the number of effective megapixels.

In certain cases, the FZ1000 may generate slightly better photographs than the FZ1000, which in typically will only be seen upon close scrutiny. The FZ300 has never let me down, and it is without a doubt the most enjoyable and fulfilling camera I have ever used, not to mention the one that captures the finest assortment of photographs of all the cameras I have had over the years. I suppose that having possessed cameras and experimented with photography for over 67 years, I am not a newcomer to the field. The FZ300 has a little longer optical reach and better weather sealing than the FZ200.

The updated FZ1000 II contains a touchscreen as well as additional 4K picture capabilities that were not available on the previous FZ1000. Of course, the most recent and finest items are more expensive. Both cameras feature a 25mm wide-angle coverage and have the same maximum aperture of f2.80 at this focal length, making them a good match. The Panasonic FZ300 has a 200mm greater reach than the Panasonic FZ1000 when it comes to telephoto lenses. The following is a side-by-side comparison of the rear views of the Panasonic FZ300 and Panasonic FZ1000.

The FZ1000 has a higher resolution, a greater dynamic range, and less noise. Before we get into our more in-depth comparison of the Panasonic FZ300 and Panasonic FZ1000, let’s take a quick look at the primary features of both cameras. It is possible to compute equivalent aperture by multiplying the lens aperture by the crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

Did this review assist you in making a choice on your camera purchase? If you’re interested in seeing how additional cameras couple up, just type the name of the camera into the search boxes provided below. There is also a collection of direct links to comparative reviews that have been discovered by other users of the CAM-parator app.


However, some cameras simply have an electronic shutter, and others have both an electronic and a mechanical shutter in addition to one another. In reality, both of the cameras under discussion are equipped with an electronic shutter, which allows them to shoot absolutely silently when necessary. While this mode is good for capturing still items, it is less ideal for photographing moving objects or shooting under artificial lighting. With 20MP, the FZ1000 has a better resolution than the FZ300; nevertheless, the FZ1000 has bigger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 2.41m compared 1.53m for the FZ300) as a result of its larger sensor (pixel pitch of 2.41m versus 1.53m for the FZ300). But since it is a somewhat more current model than the FZ1000, it is possible that its sensor has benefited from technical advancements that have occurred over this time period, which have increased the light collecting capability of its pixels.


An optical viewfinder enables the photographer to construct a picture while simultaneously seeing the precise image that will be captured by the lens. OVFs have no time lag and use no power, in contrast to electronic viewfinders, which may deplete a camera’s battery’s capacity. Aside from the body and the sensor, cameras may and do vary in a variety of other ways as well. With regard to the electronic viewfinder, the two cameras under examination are identical in that they each include one. It should be noted, however, that the one in the FZ1000 has a far greater resolution than the one in the FZ300.


We are comparing two Panasonic bridge cameras, the FZ300 and the FZ1000, in this article. Small Sensor Superzoom class cameras are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000, while Large Sensor Superzoom class cameras are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. If a sensor is shown in diagonal mode, the real size of the sensor will not be accurately displayed.


The magnifications of the viewfinders of both cameras are shown in this infographic. Compared to normal size, the black area indicates a magnification of 1x; the red region represents a magnification of 0.85x, which is the greatest value available in any camera on the market at the time of writing. As a starting point for the comparison, the following is a high-level summary of the major specifications of the two cameras. When comparing the picture quality of the FZ300 with the FZ1000, I discovered that the image quality of the FZ1000 when set to ISO 1600 is equivalent to the image quality of the FZ300 when set to ISO 400 in terms of visible noise and detail.

fz300 vs fz1000

When the FZ1000 is set to 10 MP and iZoom is increased by about 1.4x to offer an equivalent 800 mm focal length, the photographs produced by the camera are rather good. The FZ300 can be used for greater focal lengths with a lens adapter and a 1.7x tele extender lens for an equivalent focal length of around 1020 mm, however it is large, heavy, and unwieldy. The FZ1000 is the finest for landscape photography, while the FZ300 is better for animal photography. A snapshot of a fox that I took with the fz1000 will be shown below.

Raih keuntungan sebanyak mungkin di Daftar Situs Judi Slot Online Sering Kasih Jackpot kami.

Slot Anti Rungkad

Slot Gacor

Selamat saat ini anda sudah berhasil menjadi member resmi slot online Indonesia. Anda bisa memilih permainan di Bocoran Situs Judi Slot Online Gampang Menang apa saja yang anda sukai. Setelah itu barulah anda masuk ke permainan dan bisa memenangkan jackpot terbesar pada permainan judi slot online resmi.